Monday, January 08, 2007

From Son of Moses

Most of us who read or post on this blogsite are members of the School. We love the School and the people in it. We love the Teaching also. And yet we perhaps feel there is something amiss, something lacking. It seems to me that it is this feeling of dissatisfaction (which I hear more and more throughout the School) that through Kevin’s good offices, has called this blog into being.

Maybe we feel that it is the way the organization is run, or that certain unhelpful habits and assumptions have, after all these years, got fossilized into the system, as it were, or (as I feel myself) that there is something extra needed that isn’t being supplied.

Occasionally on this site there is talk of purging the School of the Gurdjieff/Ouspensky legacy. Personally, however, I feel there is plenty we can yet learn from that tradition.

Anyway, it is good to have a forum through which to express ourselves, as long as this is done constructively and without negativity or nitpicking. It is also good to be able to talk across the generations (You might be shocked to hear that I have been in the School for almost 45 years. On the other hand, you may think that the nature of my contributions make my age rather obvious).

So much for the intro. I have asked the Webmaster if I might initiate a new, but subsidiary function for this site. This was in fact one of the main functions of the original blogsites (back in those early pioneer days, almost a decade ago), namely giving fellow enthusiasts links to other sites recommended for some reason or other.

I thought I would inform you of some of the URLs that I have found, and still find, interesting and helpful.

It won’t surprise you to learn that when I was brought up in the School there was a strong assumption that we were the only ones with the truth and that we had nothing to learn from anyone else. Recognise it? This, of course, is one source of the School’s reputation for arrogance and self-congratulation, and it has made sure that we have been left out of the vital debates that have been going on around the world concerning the future of humanity at this very crucial time in its history.

I believe that it is long past the time that the School, or at least those of us who care, should join what has been called ‘the Great Conversation’, first of all listening humbly and attentively to what the best people of all nations are saying.

Interestingly enough, most of the following websites, apart from having no connection with the School, have no Advaitic pretensions either. Nonetheless, I have learnt much from them and I recommend them to you.

They are given in no particular order, but, in relation to our recent debates, the first one is the Prince of Wales speaking not very long ago of this age as the Kaliyuga, although he did not use this word, I think he calls it ‘the last times’.

Sacred Web.

One Cosmos. A rarity, a right-wing Advaitin!

Peggy Noonan. A very talented writer with intelligence and heart

First Things. An intelligent Christian magazine with a good archive:

Pathwork. This is a most wonderful spiritual system which for me supplies (as mentioned earlier) most of what is left out in our work in the School:

Wittingshire. A lovely, intelligent and cultured Christian site

Rod Dreher. his interesting Crunchy Conservative site, a man of worthy interests:

Uncommon Descent. A very good Intelligent Design site

Civitas. This one, like many, reveals my rightwing bias. I am, after all, of the old S/school

Gideon Strauss. A Neo-Calvinist of refreshingly wide interests. His two daughters’ blogs are almost as good, an impressive example of what home-schooling and a good Christian upbringing can do.

Arts & Letters Daily. Current articles, lots of good connections

Political Theory Daily Review. Tons of current articles, you have to comb out the left-wing nonsense though

These, then, are some of my favourites, some of them rather politically incorrect, really. Perhaps you can balance the picture with some of your own favourites.

8 comments:

Nick said...

I read the article from Prince Charles from the Sacred Web link. I have been gaining an increasing respect for the man anyway, but what he writes (and quotes - particularly Prof. Nasr) is the most lucid and un-arguable definition of tradition I have read.

Kevin said...

This could be the subject of a whole new post. Want to do one?

Kevin said...

On the subject of "unhelpful habits and assumptions", the Education Renaissance Trust leaflet dropped through my door this morning.

It's clear that the ERT does a lot of excellent work - supporting teaching staff to travel to South African townships; organizing conferences on education; sponsoring fees in cases of need, etc.

Unfortunately, it also does a lot of boasting and finger-wagging.

EG:
head of John Colet school writes a book with which HRH Prince of Wales is impressed "as anyone interested in education would be". That rules out those with no taste or morals, then.

"St James Durban is going to provide the best in educational values ..." Er, don't you mean "... aims to provide the best ..."?

"[St James London is] a school in which God [is] at the centre of every lesson, not just the RE classes." God's not just on our side, he's on the inside!!!

As long as I've known the School (and the ERT and St J are just extensions) it has had this habit of criticising the world at large, and then congratulating itself for its ideals, as if those (excellent) ideals had already been fully realised. 'Convivium' mag is the same.

It doesn't appear to recognise that there might be anything unbecoming in this.

My own children went to St James for 6 years and it was fine, mostly. When we left one teacher said in all seriousness how worried s/he was that we were taking them out into "the big, bad world". Gosh, thanks for the encouragement!

Update: I am pleased and relieved to inform you that neither of my children has been murdered or become a crack addict. Yet.

Anonymous said...

A small - perhaps not so small - point about 'politics'. The School must not, under Charity Commission rules, engage in any kind of political activity. I think we all know this and abide by it.

That doesn't mean that individuals can't have political views so long as they don't seek to further these through the School. In the nature of things, however, there will be a School mattress - a view of the world upon which most rest - without even questioning it.

This is currently a very conservative estimate of the world - everything going to the bad, Europe terrible, traditions under attack, etc, etc. Until recently, many believed the world was created because the leadership told them it was so.

This was not always the case. Until Andrew Maclaren died there was a radical and left-leaning streak running through the School. This was most evident in economics, especially in the teachings of Henry George.

I was recently having a conversation in the outside well of Mandeville - and told a little joke about Tony Blair and socialism. Then said that it was a fine idea - the only trouble being that it didn't work.

You would have thought I'd suggested inviting the devil to dine!

What's wrong with 'from each according to his capacity, to each according to his need'?

Sounds in accord with something else I've heard.
Worth considering anyway.

So, Son of Moses, if you were really old School you'd be an old radical liberal!

Son of Moses said...

Dear Laura,

I have to bow to your greater knowledge and experience in these matters.

After all you seem to remember the time when there was an 'outside well' at Mandeville.

I can't even remember a horse trough there.

Tell me, was this before or after the time when you and your fellow suffragettes chained yourselves to the railings in that street?

Seriously, though,I always enjoy your postings.

Kevin said...

Well, I suppose everyone is entitled to their own opinions.

It is true that there is a strong conservative bias in the School, for whatever historical reason. The association with the Liberals seems to have been overcome somehow. I think maybe it has a lot to do with the philosophical links with Plato and ancient India - both highly conservative politically.

Solidarity, comrade Laura!

Anonymous said...

..... we have nothing to lose but our chains.....

Kevin said...

Why is a right-wing Advaitin a rarity? Most of the ones I know are somewhere to the right of Attila the Hun.